Ambiguous Noncompetes

The general rule in Wisconsin is: (a)  Courts will literally interpret unambiguous contracts; and (b) extrinsic evidence will be used to interpret ambiguous contracts. A recent appellate court decision applied this general rule with respect to noncompete agreements holding that the trial court's finding that the noncompete was ambiguous was, without additional findings, not enough to find the agreement unenforceable. See

http://www.wisbar.org/res/capp/2011/2010ap000801.htm

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.wisconsinbusinesslawblog.com/admin/trackback/249689
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.